Learning.
Made to work.

A demonstration of how different learning tools can be combined to address a real performance problem.

Capability demonstration
Instructional design · Onboarding · Performance support

Built from professional experience. Content and data recreated to protect confidential information.

The training exists. The difficulty appears when the work begins.

We imagine an operational team learning a process with rules, exceptions and frequent decisions. Onboarding provides the necessary information, but predictable questions, reliance on support and application errors continue to appear at work. The challenge is to bring learning and execution closer together without turning every problem into more training.

The approach depends on the problem.

There is no single structure for every project. Needs analysis, instructional design, evaluation and measurement can draw on different models, frameworks and tools, selected according to the context and objective. For this scenario, we start with tasks, decisions, recurring errors and the moments where support is needed. Other situations could call for a different combination of tools.

Task & Learning Matrix

In this scenario, a matrix helps separate what needs to be learned, practised, referenced or escalated. It is one possible tool for avoiding curricula where everything receives the same weight.

Learn

Knowledge

Essential principles for understanding the work.

Practice

Decisions

Tasks that need application and feedback.

Reference

Lookup

Detail that can live in a support resource.

Escalate

Limits

Cases where knowing when to ask for support is part of the process.

Example deliverable · demonstrative content

Learning Journey

For this problem, we propose a journey that progressively moves learning closer to real work, introduces practice before the end of training and maintains support during the transition to work.

Foundation→Guided practice→Scenarios→Shadow→Live support

Example onboarding architecture · not a client curriculum

Scenario-based assessment

Instead of testing whether someone can recall a rule, an exercise can test whether they can apply it to a decision similar to one they will face at work.

Example screen
A request arrives with missing information and more than one potentially applicable rule.

Apply the most common rule
Check the missing information before deciding
Escalate immediately

What this exercise assesses: application, identification of missing information and decision quality. The content is demonstrative; the purpose here is to show the assessment format and logic.

Decision Aid

In this scenario, some information does not need to be memorised. A reference resource can support decisions at the moment of work. The aim is to make the decision clearer without turning everything into training.

Enough information?
↓ no: verify information · yes: continue
Standard situation?
↓ no: check exception · yes: apply process
Resolved with the reference?
↓ no: escalate · yes: execute

Example deliverable · does not represent a client policy or process

Measure to understand what needs to change.

Assessment, shadowing, quality, error patterns and feedback can help identify whether the problem sits in knowledge, practice, documentation, process or available support.

Assessment→Shadow→Quality→Patterns→Iteration

Illustrative indicators · no client results or metrics

A new demonstration, informed by real work.

The content on this page was created from scratch. The choices shown are only one possible combination. The approach comes from professional experience in training, onboarding, curriculum design and optimisation, refresher sessions, assessments, reference materials, performance support and follow-through in operational environments. It is not presented as PAULOS client work.

OnboardingCurriculaTrainingAssessmentsPerformance supportLearning operations

Learning designed around the problem.

Explore Learning ↗Explore Operations ↗Discuss a project ↗